Leaders of wealthy nations will emphasize their commitment to deeper how to help poor countries nancy birdsall, dani rodrik, so far obviously, both countries would be considerably poorer without access to mar kets abroadbut what distinguishes them is not the exter. If wealthy nations share a certain portion of their wealth to the poor nations, it will be a great help to initiate new businesses and investment for a poor nation moreover, the basic needs of a country such as education and health can be filled up by donation of medicines and teaching materials. To conclude, wealthy countries should assist poorer nations in times of natural disasters to help them recover because rich nations can afford to extend their aid and the developing countries have no capability to immediately survive and regain what was lost for their living. To suggest that we should seek to help the poorest at home by withdrawing support from people abroad who are much poorer, while the rich make off with their millions, is surely morally. The best countries for development policy industrialized nations that put the best effort into helping poorer ones the top 10 wealthy that are most dedicated to helping poorer nations.
Finally,rich nations should help to improve the economy of poor countriesthis can be done by promoting free tradethis wil reduce barriers to international trade such as tariff,import quotas and export fee and will help to lift the developing countries out of poverty. I think that rich nations should help the poor nations because if someone desperately needs clothes, food or drink then they should get it also imagine if you were living in africa, and you were poor and in poverty. To summarise, i think wealthier nations should help poorer ones not until something is done about it will developed countries be able to solve a lot of the problems of their own moreover, helping poorer countries is our moral obligation and could be seen as a compensation for what was once done to colonies by their owners. I believe that rich eu countries should help poor eu countries but the poorer eu countries must acknowledge receipt of charity with grace and endeavour to execute a ‘culture transplant’ to usurp ‘systemic, endemic, epidemic and pandemic’ levels of corruption so often a ‘feature’ of some poor ‘club med’ countries.
If still, the question-why should rich countries help poorer countries’ arises in our minds, then we need to know that the economic differences between the rich and the poor countries can not be minimised unless the rich countries show interest and a sense of responsibility in assisting less fortunate countries. Deaton argues that, by trying to help poor people in developing countries, the rich world may actually be corrupting those nations' governments and slowing their growth. Some people think that wealthy nations must share their wealthy among poorer nations by giving different helps such as food, healthy care and education other think that governments of poorer nations should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education. There is no doubt that more than 90% of the population living in poorer countries are below poverty line i firmly believe that the wealthy nations should support the poor countries by giving aid toward things like food and literature. Rich nations should help poor ones and rich persons should help poor ones however, the way the world is, right now, money = power so, powerful countries and persons lose control when the average person no longer needs any help.
This was a very interesting book as david took the time to explore whether or not rich nations should help poorer nations he starts with defining what determines if a country is poor and the history of aid given to nations. Yes, the wealthy do have an obligation to help the poor however, the term “wealthy” needs to be defined as does the term “poor” our society has become one of haves and have-nots with a. Ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay: you should spend about 40 minutes on this task some people say that rich nations should help poor countries with their basic needs like food and education while others oppose the idea and argue that the poor nation themselves should try to improve their condition.
In conclusion, wealthy nations should help the poorest nations to survive in hard times and in harsh environment and such things as food and basic education should be provided to all people, however governments of problematic states should be the first to care about problems of population. The awful toll of poverty across the world should make the strongest possible claim on the conscience of the rich west, citizens and governments alike. Theme: should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations or such poor countries should look after themselves point 1: development is something largely determined by poorer nations themselves. Apart from being favorable, wealthy nations should help because many owe their prosperity to poorer nations from past exploitation, slavery, and colonialism needless to say, returning some wealth back to the countries it was ‘stolen’ from would be beneficial and the right thing to do.
Furthermore, if wealthy countries just provide food and facilities for education to poorer nations, it would leads to weaken the poorer nations to provide something does not solve problems that poorer countries have. Thus, rich nations should try and stop giving aid to poorer nations so that poorer nations will start to rely on themselves there is a reason for rich nations to think twice before giving aid to poorer nations as there are corrupt governments which misuse the aid given to them. How you make a resume should wealthy nations help poorer nations essay help with homework sims 4 graduate term papers and essays. Wealthy nations got their wealth by killing and enslaving nations with more primitive technology foundation of usa and canada, the wealth of europe etc they all stem from this if you say you are not the one who did all those things, you are correct.